Determination of Sensitivity and Specificity of High Resolution CT Scan in Evaluation of Cardiac and Extra-Cardiac Anomalies among Bangladeshi Children

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   M. Shirin

  •   R. Mondal

  •   H. Zubery

Abstract

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the important causes of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric age group. Invasive angiography is considered as gold standard method for the diagnosis of pediatric cardiovascular diseases. Multi-detector CT cardiac angiogram by using 64 slice scanner is a useful modality and suitable alternative to previous invasive procedure in evaluation of congenital heart disease. The present study was conducted in the Department of Cardiology of NICVD during the period of September 2019 to August 2020 (One year). We selected 40 patients presenting in the outpatient department of National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases and Hospital (NICVD) who were diagnosed to have congenital heart disease clinically and radiologically. CT angiogram revealed ASD in 10%, coarctation of aorta in 5%, Pentalogy of Fallot in 2.5%, Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) in 32.5%, Ventricular septal defect (VSD) in 30.0%, PAH in 2.5%, PS in 5%, RVH with PS in 2.5%, PDA in 5% and Tricuspid atresia with ASD with VSD with PS in 2.5% patients. Conventional catheter angiogram revealed ASD in 5%, VSD in 32.5%, TOF in 30%, PS in 12.5%, Coarctation of aorta in 5% and Pentalogy of Fallots in 5%. The diagnostic performance of MDCT in the diagnosis and evaluation of congenital heart disease was high.


Keywords: Computed tomography, congenital heart disease, echocardiography

References

Mitchell SC, Korones SB, Berendes HW. Congenital heart disease in 56,109 births. Incidence and natural history. Circulation. 1971; 43: 323-32.

Kawano T, Ishii M, Takagi J, Maeno Y, Eto G, Sugahara Y, et al. Three-dimensional helical computed tomographic angiography in neonates and infants with complex congenital heart disease. American Heart Journal. 2020; 139(4): 653-660.

Moon Y, Kim YM, Kim TH, Kim MY, Lee JY, Kim HS. Congenital anomalies of aortic arch: CT angiography. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2001; 44: 51-58.

Becker C, Soppa C, Fink U, Haubner M, Müller-Lisse,U, Englmeier KH, et al. Spiral CT angiography and 3D reconstruction in patients with aortic coarctation. European Radiology. 1997; 7(9): 1473-1477.

Haramati LB, Glickstein FS, Issenberg HF, Haramati N, Crooke GA. MR imaging and CT of vascular anomalies and connections in patients with congenital heart disease: significance in surgical planning. Radio Graphics. 2002; 22: 337-349.

Ulla M, Abramzon FA, Monaco RDG. 64 row CT angiography: diagnosing paediatric CVD disease. HIRE. 2008; 3: 2-4.

Budoff MJ, Lu B, Shinbane JS, Chen L, Child J, Carson S, et al. Methodology for improved detection of coronary stenoses with computed tomographic angiography. American Heart Journal. 2004; 148(6): 1085-1090.

Ruan W, Yang MN, Gong Y, Qiao L, Mo X, Teng G. Diagnosis of complicated congenital heart diseases in neonates and infants using 64-slice spiral CT. Scientific Research and Essays. 2011; 6: 146-156.

Samanek M, Slavík Z, Zborilova B, Hrobonova V, Vorískova M, Skovranek J. Prevalence, treatment, and outcome of heart disease in live-born children: a prospective analysis of 91,823 live-born children. Pediatric Cardiology. 1989; 10: 205-11.

Sipek A, Gregor V, Sipek A Jr, Hudakova J, Horacek J, Klaschka J, et al. Incidence of congenital heart defects in the Czech Republic--current data. Ceska Gynekol’s. 2010; 75: 221-42.

Kani H, Narabayashi I, Tanikake M, Matsuki M, Uesung Y. Usefulness of Multidetector-row Computed Tomography (MD-CT) for Diagnosis and Evaluation of Cardiovascular Anomalies in Infants. Bulletin of the Osaka Medical College 2005; 51: 23-34.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Shirin, M., Mondal, R., & Zubery, H. (2021). Determination of Sensitivity and Specificity of High Resolution CT Scan in Evaluation of Cardiac and Extra-Cardiac Anomalies among Bangladeshi Children. European Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2(6), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.24018/clinicmed.2021.2.6.146